By Wendell Brock, MBA, ChFC
Today the FDIC issued the Fourth Quarter 2007 banking profile, which contained very mixed results on a slippery slope. The industry as a whole is struggling through the latest national economic tidal wave of debt problems from the sub-prime termoil to an over leveraged derivative market. So the banks are squeezed between tougher regulation enforcement, higher deposit rates, lower net interest margins, larger loan loss reserves, higher charge off and noncurrent accounts, growth in deposits, etc. The following are some key highlights.
Widespread earnings weakness occurred in more than half the institutions - "51.2% reported lower net income than in the 4th quarter of 2006. One out of four institutions with assets greater than $10 billion reported a net loss for the fourth quarter." During the 4th quarter interest rates fell, which increased downward pressure on Net Interest Margins (NIM), making it the lowest quarterly NIM since 1989.
Total earnings for banks were off by 27.4% for all of 2007, which was a decline of $39.8 billion to $105.5 billion. This is the first time since 1999-2000 that annual net income declined. Only 49.2% of insured institutions reported improved earnings in 2007 - the lowest level in 23 years. Unprofitable institutions reached a 26 year high of 11.6% at the same time the ROA was the lowest in 26 years at 0.86%. This is the first time since the mid 1970's that noninterest income has declined - it fell by 2.9% to $233.4 billion.
2007 fourth quarter net charge offs spiked nearly 100% to $16.2 billion over the same quarter in 2006 which had $8.5 billion. This increase has regulators very worried. In mid 2006 the amount of noncurrent loans (loans which are 90 days past due) began an upward movement, this loan pool continued to swell by $26.9 billion, a increase of 32.5% during the 4th quarter of 2007. "The percentage of loans that were noncurrent at year-end was 1.39%, the highest level since the third quarter of 2002." This has prompted banks to put more away in their Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL). The ALLL reserve ratio rose from 1.13% to 1.29% during the quarter; however it was not enough to cover the increase in noncurrent loans. "At year end, one in three institutions had noncurrent loans that exceeded reserves, compared to fewer than one in four institutions a year earlier."
Equity capital increased by $25.1 billion or 1.9%; at the same time the leverage ratio fell to 7.98% down from 8.14%. "In contrast, the industry's total risk-based capital ratio, which includes loss reserves, increased from 12.74% to 12.79%." In the end 99% of all insured institutions, which represents more than 99% of industry assets, met or exceeded the highest regulatory capital requirements. During this same time, banks were lending money - asset growth continued strong - assets increased by $331.8 billion or 2.6% during the quarter. Because of the high increase in noncurrent loans, examiners have been watching closely the concentrations of bank portfolios in commercial real estate. In spite of the construction slow down, the number of banks that have a high concentration of construction lending increased from 2,348 to 2,368. A high concentration of commercial real estate loans in a bank's loan portfolio is defined when that part of the loan portfolio exceeds the bank's total capital.
Deposits grew to record levels during the 4th quarter. Institutions saw an increase of $170.6 billion or 2.5%, the largest quarterly increase ever reported. "The industry's ratio of deposits to total assets, which hit an all time low of 64.4% at the end of the 3rd quarter, rose slightly to 64.5% at year end."
For the year, Trust Assets increased an amazing $2.6 trillion or 13.4% for managed accounts and $68.6 billion or 1.6% for non-managed accounts. "Five institutions accounted for 53% of the industry's net trust income in 2007."
In 2007, there were only three bank failures, this is the most since 2004 - this ended the unprecedented run of no bank failures (there was only one failure in the 4th quarter). The two-year term was the longest in the FDIC's history. During the quarter, there were 50 de novo banks, which brought the total for the year up to 181 new institutions. Mergers in the 4th quarter slowed down to 74 for an annual total of 321 banks merged out of existence. The regulator's problem bank list grew to 76 banks, up from 65 at the close of the 3rd quarter. The total assets of these problem banks are $22.3 billion, up from $18.5 billion at the end of the 3rd quarter. The total FDIC insured institutions ended the year at 8,533 down, slightly from 8,559. For a complete copy of the report see request for a white paper.
By:
Wendell Brock, MBA, ChFC
Principal
De Novo Strategy
www.denovostrategy.com
By John Fronza
If you do not have a branding consultant, you are the consultant.
You need to spend your time on raising capital and producing revenue; not designing a logo, writing copy, formatting brochures, and placing ads, or any of the many details required for a successful branding campaign.
We can handle everything from helping you name your bank and design your logo to designing your website and public relations. In the grand scheme of things you will have more time, raise your capital faster, and earn more.
Why do you need a branding campaign? How is the investment justified?
Your logo and marketing materials will be seen and have an impact on not only your Officers, Directors, Executives, and employees, but on your customers, potential customers, competitors, and the general public.
They represent you and your organization - your products and services as well as your professionalism, integrity, and ethics.
The image you develop now will be used throughout the life of your business and determine your business's level of success. If your image is one of a solid, stable company that delivers what it promises, you are more likely to be successful.
What do you think of when you see this logo?
Nike, of course. An established, reliable company that has used the same logo for many years.
This is what you want to accomplish - a sound identity.
Branding is an investment with a high rate of return. What can you expect your return on investment (ROI) to be?
Let's say that you would typically expect to spend six months raising the capital for your bank without any marketing materials or branding. During these six months your bank is not producing any revenue, you are still waiting to open your doors to customers, and each month that passes costs you $50,000. It has been proven that with the right materials, branding, and a proven process the capital raising time is shortened by fifty-percent. So, you have already saved $150,000.
Moving forward, your bank will be instantly recognizable to customers and potential customers resulting in more deposits and faster growth. You stand out amongst all of the other community banks. Why? Because customers and the general public instantly recognize your professional image which is consistent in every way relating to your bank.
Fronza Design's successfully proven program for de novo banks is a small investment to expedite the capital raising process, brand your bank, and ensure success.
Let us show you how to save time, money, and help you achieve your goal.
If you are in search of a $10,000 investor, you need to look like a $10,000 opportunity.
Fronza Design, LLC
125 Timber Oak Cove
Lawrenceville, GA 30043
678-377-3013
www.fronzadesign.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 7, 2008
Media Contact:
David Barr (202) 898-6992
cell: (703) 622-4790
e-mail: dbarr@fdic.gov
Hume Bank, Hume, Missouri, was closed today by the Commissioner of Missouri's Division of Finance, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named receiver. To protect depositors, the FDIC Board of Directors approved the assumption of Hume Bank's insured deposits by Security Bank, Rich Hill, Missouri.
The failed bank's sole office will reopen Monday as a branch of Security Bank. Depositors of Hume Bank will automatically become depositors of the assuming bank.
As of December 31, 2007, Hume Bank had total assets of $18.7 million and total deposits of $13.6 million. Security Bank has agreed to assume $12.5 million of the failed bank's insured deposits for a premium of 4.26 percent.
At the time of closing, Hume Bank had approximately $1.1 million in 33 deposit accounts that exceeded the federal deposit insurance limit. These customers will have immediate access to their insured deposits, and they will become creditors of the receivership for the amount of their uninsured funds.
Over the weekend, customers can access their money by writing checks, or by using their debit or ATM cards. Checks drawn on the bank that did not clear before today will be honored up to the insured limit.
Customers with questions about how deposit insurance works, or who would like more information about the failure, can either call the FDIC toll-free at 1-866-806-6128 or visit the FDIC's Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/Hume.html. The toll-free number will be operational until 9:00 p.m. (Central time) this evening. Beginning tomorrow and into the following week, the number will operate daily from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Central time.
In addition to assuming the insured deposits of the failed bank, Security Bank will purchase approximately $2.7 million of Hume Bank's assets. The FDIC will retain the remaining assets for later disposition.
At this time, the FDIC does not have an estimate for the cost of this transaction to its Deposit Insurance Fund. Both failures of FDIC-insured banks this year have been in Missouri. The first was Douglass National Bank, Kansas City, Missouri, on January 25, 2008.